Darshan moves Karnataka HC over murder trial

Darshan, who is an accused in the case, had earlier sought physical production during the proceedings along with three other accused. The Bengaluru trial court rejected the applications on August 17 and directed that the accused could attend hearings through video conference.

The defence has argued that the virtual arrangement has been affected by connectivity and technical problems. Darshan’s lawyers have also highlighted the large volume of material involved in the case, saying the accused needs regular and meaningful interaction with the legal team to properly assist in his defence.

The prosecution, however, has opposed the request for physical production. It has maintained that the applicable provisions of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita allow proceedings and evidence to be handled through audio-video electronic means. The prosecution has also argued that Darshan has not demonstrated that the virtual arrangement has prejudiced his defence.

The trial court cited the substantial police deployment and logistical arrangements that would be required to bring the accused to court for every hearing. It also expressed concern that Darshan’s physical presence could create a crowded or disruptive situation around the courtroom.

The court, while refusing physical production, directed officials to ensure that the video-conferencing system remains properly functional and that technical personnel are available.

The prosecution has listed around 272 witnesses, with approximately 150 expected to be examined during the trial. Darshan’s latest petition before the High Court seeks reconsideration of the arrangement and permission for his physical presence during proceedings.